We love our shows so much we created a blog for it.
athenawj is a writer-mama-artist-editor-blue ribbon junkie who can't get enough of her favorite t.v. shows (and the ridiculous amount of videotapes in her house proves it). She's owned various t.v.s for awhile, but only recently discovered the joys of OnDemand.
merserene is a professional-turned-student who has an unhealthy addiction to some shows. She bought her first TV last year and is particularly fond of old reruns and British comedy.
Alias
Coupling
Desperate Housewives
Fawlty Towers
Keeping Up Appearances
Rick Steves' Europe
Sex And The City
Two And A Half Men
What Not To Wear
In my years watching SVU, I don't recall coming across an episode so intriguing, unique, yet disturbing all at the same time. Whoever thought of and wrote tonight's episode, I applaud him/her for delving into a new frontier. Victims of sexual identity reassignment aren't what one would associate with "special victims" in the sense that this series has usually portrayed it. I wouldn't know how often "accidents" happen, but some would consider babies who have been circumcised to be victims as well, since they have absolutely no say in it, plus there is increasing study that circumcisions may be too traumatic and not as beneficial as previously thought.
Enough with the social commentary...
I knew something was up since the preview from last week, when they showed this pair of sister and brother who looked exactly identical. While fraternal twins can look like each other, they don't usually look completely identical. I couldn't get over how much the two look alike - if in fact, there were 2 actors instead of one - and my suspicion was confirmed when they went discovered both were born identical boys. I swear I saw the same blemishes when they showed the kids' profiles - will have to wait until TV Tome or some other site list the credits for the episode to find out if there was one or two of them.
A funny bit in the somber episode: Did the father look familiar to anyone? I giggled to myself as he explained to the detectives that Lindsay had urinary tract infection or whatever medical term it was, because I recognize him from the Viagra commercials as the guy with the Viagra devil horns "who's back" after taking the pill. Hee. It kinda went downhill from there and I couldn't take him seriously anymore.
Rating: 9 out of 10 stars.
ETA: Ok, a little research on IMDb didn't pop up anything about tonight's episode, but I did come across the famously running joke that apparently everyone has been employing other than us Two Ladies: "Is it because I'm a lesbian?" Some folks on the IMDb boards confess to using that line randomly in their convesations as well, i.e. "You didn't email me. Is it because I'm a lesbian?" The more hilarious anecdote comes from someone who said his guy friend used that line to the Dell Support guy when Dell was about to put him on hold, and the customer rep.'s response is, "Uh, I'll put you right through." :D
I believe "Is it because I'm a lesbian?" will be Elizabeth Rohm's career-defining moment.

athenawj on Thank goodness He/Sh...
Windhazel on Thank goodness He/Sh...
Ain't It Cool News
doc tower's hole in the wall
Food Network
Internet Movie Database
Law & Order
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
Roger Ebert.com
Television Without Pity
TV Tome
What Shall It Be Today
today
October 2006
September 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
visited *loading* times